On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Mike Cloaked <mike.cloa...@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Thomas Bächler
<tho...@archlinux.org>
wrote:
Am 23.10.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Mike Cloaked:
> Oct 23 15:41:56 localhost kernel: CPU0 microcode updated early to
revision
> 0x1b, date = 2014-05-29
>
> Does this mean that the quoted early update has used the wrong
file from
an
> earlier date than current, or does this journal log line confirm
correct
> early loading of the up-to-date microcode?
This is the timestamp that marks Intel's internal version. This is
what
I get:
[ 0.000000] lije kernel: CPU0 microcode updated early to revision
0x1c, date = 2014-07-03
On a second machine (a Haswell laptop) I get:
Oct 23 15:16:38 localhost kernel: CPU0 microcode updated early to
revision
0x1c, date = 2014-07-03
which might suggest that mine has the same CPU as yours, so that this
is
indeed the latest internal version date for the microcode - (which
makes me
feel a little easier seeing you get the same as me!)
Is anyone only having one core updated? I get this:
> dmesg | grep microcode
[ 0.000000] CPU0 microcode updated early to revision 0x29, date =
2013-06-12
[ 0.344194] microcode: CPU0 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x10, revision=0x29
[ 0.344203] microcode: CPU1 sig=0x206a7, pf=0x10, revision=0x28
[ 0.344260] microcode: Microcode Update Driver: v2.00
<tig...@aivazian.fsnet.co.uk>, Peter Oruba
I checked dmesg and I can find no error messages.
--
Jody
