besides the "upstream stable release" discussion (which i will leave out here) i have two small questions:
On 12/17/2014 03:03 PM, Ido Rosen wrote: > On the gnupg-devel mailing list I've seen a few > potentially serious security issues with it. No offense, but out of interest: Could you please point them out with some references and links what exactly you consider "potentially serious security issues" on that mailing list? If its something that was not noticed to be potentially a serious security issue, did you raise awareness about that on the list or privately to the dev? On 12/17/2014 05:28 PM, Ido Rosen wrote: > [...] Someone made > a mistake in upgrading to 2.1, so let's correct the mistake by > downgrading back until it's safe, rather than leaving all of Arch's > users at great security risk. out of curiosity, what exactly and specifically do you consider a "great security risk" in 2.1. I would appreciate if you provide a concrete reference in 2.1 what you mean with "great security risk". thanks in advice, cheers, Levente
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
