> I interpreted this thread as a bug report with 'The Arch Way' page on > the wiki so it hasn't been for naught. That page has been rewritten to > better reflect what has always been the development philosophy instead > of being a vague advertisement for the distribution with questionable > claims. > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/The_Arch_Way > > It's not perfect, but it's a lot more grounded in reality now. > > I have to say, well done Daniel. Glad something useful finally emerged from this thread.
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dep... Eli Schwartz
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new depende... Olivier Langlois
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dep... Neven Sajko
- Re: [arch-general] systemd ne... Daniel Micay
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new depende... Eduardo Machado
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dep... Terry Z.
- Re: [arch-general] systemd ne... Sebastiaan Lokhorst
- Re: [arch-general] system... Daniel Micay
- Re: [arch-general] system... Eduardo Machado
- Re: [arch-general] system... Daniel Micay
- Re: [arch-general] system... David Kaylor
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dep... Daniel Micay
- Re: [arch-general] systemd ne... Bardur Arantsson
- Re: [arch-general] system... Yaro Kasear
- Re: [arch-general] system... Henrik Danielsson
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dependencies impede ... Guus Snijders
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dependencies im... Jens Adam
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dependencie... Daniel Micay
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dependencies impede ... Jan Alexander Steffens
- Re: [arch-general] systemd new dependencies impede ... LoneVVolf