On 12/07/2016 11:17 AM, Gregory Mullen wrote: > If the argument left is, I don't want (better checksum) because it's > shouldn't be thought of as a security check, and I want a security check. > > Why can't the requirement be PGP sig's are now required, and we drop the > checksum completely?
Won't work because many upstreams don't provide signatures.
Maybe giving a warning ("source authenticity was not verified due to
lack of GPG signature") would work?
--
GPG fingerprint: 871F 1047 7DB3 DDED 5FC4 47B2 26C7 E577 EF96 7808
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
