On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 09:02:24PM +0100, Neven Sajko via arch-general wrote: > ... But there probably should be some TOS ...
Why? Would a ToS be a legally binding document? If yes, it will constrain Arch, which is not good. If no, then it's just a meaningless text. I understand that companies have ToS because they want to cover their back legally, but Arch is different in this regard... Cheers, -- Leonid Isaev
