A temporary ethernet connection in another location likely will work
with sufficient download privileges.
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 07:21:49
From: Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org>
To: "arch-general@archlinux.org" <arch-general@archlinux.org>
Cc: Junayeed Ahnaf <nirj...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO
How can I install dialog when I don't have wifi?
Sent from BlueMail<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=10066>
On Jul 24, 2017, at 5:17 PM, Jude DaShiell
<jdash...@panix.com<mailto:jdash...@panix.com>> wrote:
try the -o switch with wifi-menu is helpful and make sure you already have
the dialog package installed before you run wifi-menu. On Mon, 24 Jul
2017, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote:
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2017 03:54:02
From: Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general <arch-general@archlinux.org>
To: "arch-general@archlinux.org" <arch-general@archlinux.org>
Cc: Junayeed Ahnaf <nirj...@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO
I've installed ArchLinux on 3 desktops so far, and I've done them
successfully, so I must have *RTFM* , I was just wondering why is it
hard to configure wifi. Since I failed to configure wifi with
wpa_supplicant. I'll try with wifi-menu today, and report progress.
No need to be so aggressive man.
On 07/24/2017 01:48 PM, Robert Wong via arch-general wrote:
A general Arch installation is nothing but a minimal set
of GNU/Linux system with a package manager, which
can be configured into anything. I'm not going any
further for you have made yourself clear that you
haven't done your research. Offensive as it can be, I'd
say *RTFM*.
PS: It's apparently navie to say sth like Arch is nothing
but a desktop for archlinux.org<http://archlinux.org> itself runs on Arch Linux.
RW
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [arch-general] Why there is no NetworkManager in ArchISO
From: Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general
To: arch-general@archlinux.org
CC: Junayeed Ahnaf
All fine and good but I don't see arch being installed on something
other than desktop/laptop. Of course there are niche cases as arch
server I do not doubt but how much of arch install base is traditional
desktop? I think it's rather high.
On 07/24/2017 01:30 PM, ITwrx.org<http://ITwrx.org> wrote:
On 07/24/2017 12:30 AM, Junayeed Ahnaf via arch-general wrote:
Why is there no NetworkManager in ArchISO?
Arch Linux is not like desktop focused distributions. Therefore, it's
ISO does not come with "everything but the kitchen sink" where you have
a turn-key desktop after running a GUI installer or install script. It
has the base set of software you need to assemble what you need for your
given install target.
Isn't it widely accepted as
the go to method of connecting to internet in Linux?
No, not in general like that. Network manager is primarily used for
network management with desktop environments, most commonly Gnome, as
the other respondent noted. Arch Linux is used in many different ways,
not only for the desktop.
Is there any reason
for it not to be default?
The defaults for the ISO would generally be the simpler options, and
less likely to be something large with a lot of dependencies. Also,
minimalist ISOs were the norm rather than the exception in years past
and for Reasons. They still are in some cases or with some distros.
Also, there are not always application defaults with Arch Linux like you
might have with a desktop distro. Arch is "DIY/build your own and choose
your own defaults (for the most part)" type of distro.
--
