Hello. I was repacking amdgpu-pro deb files and when I started converting licences, I have noticed that libdrm* packages have a MIT Licence text in copyright file. I decided to check if AUR/libdrm-git and Extra/libdrm uses MIT licence, but they don't. I contacted Lone_Wolf (maintainer of libdrm-git) and he said that he used a licence from Extra/libdrm. Should not it be changed to MIT instead of custom?
- [arch-general] License for libdrm packages ashark
- Re: [arch-general] License for libdrm p... mpan
- Re: [arch-general] License for libd... ashark
- Re: [arch-general] License for ... mpan
- Re: [arch-general] License ... Eli Schwartz via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Lic... Lone_Wolf
- Re: [arch-general]... mar77i via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] License ... mar77i via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general] Lic... mar77i via arch-general
- Re: [arch-general]... ProgAndy
- Re: [arch-gene... Eli Schwartz via arch-general