Don't worry dear Michael! I am (better to say many of us are) excited to see it on ArchWiki. And if your tools are of a good quality and faith, there is a good chance going to official repos in the future.
What happened to your article is just part of the process. I also exprienced the same many times, and at the end it results to a much better content. And to be specific, One can always refer to any good available tool for doing a task; but! if it's not available in Arch repositories yet, then it should not be introduced as the default tool for doing the task. -- Best Regards, Abraham Sent with Tutanota; https://tuta.com
