On 31.03.2017 09:22, Andreas Baumann wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 11:13:53PM +0200, Erich Eckner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> sry. The problem is on my end. >> It looks like I overshot by adopting all of the x86_64 changes for i686. >> http://mirror.archlinux32.org/archisos/archlinux-2017.03.30-i686.iso >> should work (at least, this works - in contrast to the other one - for me). >> Maybe someone with more experience in building the iso than me can have >> a look what piece between commit 6a3cb4a and 12f27c7 broke archiso32 >> (github.com/archlinux32/archiso32)? >> >> I hope, everything works fine, now. > > Hi, > > The 2017.03.30 booted fine on both libvirt and on my ASUS P2B-S machine. > I did a full reinstall on libvirt with the 2017.03.30 version, no problems. > > Cheers, > > Andreas >
Hi, I think, I found my mistake (forgot to cherry-pick some lines from the original commit), current Iso is online: https://mirror.archlinux32.org/archisos/testing/archlinux-2017.04.01-i686.iso Besides comments on (problems with) the iso(s), also any comments on the archiso-fork (github.com/archlinux32/archiso32) and the archiso-packages (https://arch.eckner.net/archlinuxewe/os/any/archiso-dual-31-1-any.pkg.tar.xz and https://arch.eckner.net/archlinuxewe/os/any/archiso32-31-4-any.pkg.tar.xz) are apreciated. Something more general: Maybe, we should set up some standard way to inform testers of new versions to test? (some separate mailing list? archweb? ...?) I guess, this list is not solely for (sup)porting i686, and others might not want to get spammed with i686-test-release news. cheers, Erich _______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports
