Hello, I do have a quick follow-up question. My friends who works for CIP United told me that they've already got a full Debian port, and it can be run with either qemu-system or qemu-user (unfortunately it seems actual hardware for MIPS64 R6 aren't available yet, probably due to the global silicon shortage). So I'm wondering will it be easier if I first compile pacman against Debian libraries, and use that to natively bootstrap a stage1 image than using cross compiler for bootstrapping?
Thank you for your time and have a nice day. Sincerely ________________________________________ From: Andreas Baumann Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 02:27 To: Discussion regarding the porting of Arch Linux to non-x86_64 architectures Cc: Sijie Bu Subject: Re: [arch-ports] Advice on bootstrapping Arch onto a new architecture? Reply-To: Andreas Baumann <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <by5pr14mb3669acc64af81801392f1f64da...@by5pr14mb3669.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 09:00:04AM +0000, Sijie Bu via arch-ports wrote: > (This message was originally posted on arch-general and I was redirected by a > member to this list.) > > Hello, Hi, > I am about to start working as an intern at CIP United, a company focusing on > MIPS chips, and I will be bootstrapping Arch Linux onto the MIPS64r6 > architecture, in a fashion similar to Arch Linux ARM. > > I have checked the Arch Linux MIPS project, but it seems to be inactive for > years now. I have checked ArchWiki's DeveloperWiki section, but it seems to > lack guidelines or suggestions on bootstrapping Arch onto a new architecture. > Therefore I have a few questions: > - Intuitively, I think I should cross-compile the packages of the "core" > section (sans a few x64-specific packages) and build a bootable rootfs, but I > was having some trouble finding how should I set makepkg to cross-compile. Do > I just set up an Arch developer environment as usual, but substitute the > toolchain with the cross ones? I did a "cross-compile" from x86_64 to i486 some time ago, you can maybe find some useful information in https://git.archlinux32.org/bootstrap32/. I can also recommend the oakensource's RISC-V port at https://github.com/oaken-source/parabola-cross-bootstrap Basically yes, you'll need a cross toolchain for MIPS, either from the AUR or use a cross-platorm distro like http://t2sde.org/ to bootstrap directly from MIPS (in qemu or so). > - Does adding a new architecture require modifications to the pacman source > code? Or pacman itself should support new architectures? I have also tried > looking at pacman source code, and it seems to not have hard-coded list of > architectures, but I am not 100% sure about this (if I'll have to modify the > source code of pacman, I will be emailing the pacman-dev mailing list > regarding their policies on patches etc.). In theory pacman should be quite portable (it runs at least on x86_64, IA32, ARM 32-bit, AARCH64). So the typical 32-/64-bit issues should have been fixed. You will have to make pacman know about your new architecture (and eventually subarchitectures). See our fork of pacman on https://git.archlinux32.org/pacman/ (basically auto-detection for SSE2, support for sub-architectures 'i486', 'i686', 'pentium4'). Most work I expect in breaking cycles and dependencies in PKGBUILDs. > > Thank you for your time and have a nice day. > Sincerely > _______________________________________________ > arch-ports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports Happy porting, feel free to ask questions on IRC at #archinux-ports or #archlinux32. :-) Cheers Andreas -- Andreas Baumann Trottenstrasse 20 CH-8037 Zuerich Telefon: +41(0)76/373 01 29 E-mail: [email protected] Homepage: www.andreasbaumann.cc _______________________________________________ arch-ports mailing list [email protected] https://lists.archlinux.org/listinfo/arch-ports
