Am 28.02.2012 09:57, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:59, Thomas Bächler <tho...@archlinux.org> wrote: >> Am 28.02.2012 00:31, schrieb Jouke Witteveen: >>> Dear Thomas and the rest, >>> >>> A few of us have been looking at the netcfg code lately. One thing >>> that came to light was that FS#24599 is actualy a wpa_actiond bug, so, >>> Thomas, could you take it upon you? >> >> I looked into it shortly, the last comment is correct. > > That comment was mine. I wondered whether there was a reason to look > at occurrences of ']'.
The lack of a proper API to the wpa_supplicant management interface forces us to parse the output of the status notifications ourselves. The notification in question looks like this: <2>CTRL-EVENT-CONNECTED - Connection to 00:11:22:33:44:55 completed (reauth) [id=10 id_str=profile_name] This format is about as primitive and broken as my parser. Given that this is only a single line, the patch I'll send in a minute SHOULD solve this, but I can't test this anytime soon.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
