On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Jelle van der Waa <je...@vdwaa.nl> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Seblu <se...@seblu.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: >> > On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Seblu <se...@seblu.net> wrote: >> >> On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Tom Gundersen <t...@jklm.no> wrote: >> >>> /srv is admin territory, similar to /home. No package should >> >>> put stuff there. >> >> Are you sure of this? >> >> Currently many "http" packages use /srv/http to put static files. e.g >> >> backuppc, flyspray, roundcube... >> >> >> >> >> >> http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#SRVDATAFORSERVICESPROVIDEDBYSYSTEM >> > >> > The consensus seems to be that we don't let packages put stuff in >> > /srv, so I thought it would make sense to let namcap reflect this. >> Sure ! >> >> I just wondering what is the arch way of doing web package :) >> what's about adding /etc/webapps and /usr/share/webapps in php.ini ? We already add /srv/http.
-- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net