On 07/17/17 at 09:00am, Adonay Felipe Nogueira via arch-projects wrote: > Indeed. things under GPL 2 (notice the lack of "+"/"or later") can't > adapt/depend on things under GPL 3. > > Things under both GPL 2 and its "+"/"or later" version can't > adapt/depend on things under Apache 2.0. However, things under GPL 3 and > its "+"/"or later" version can.
I'm not fond of moving to GPLv3, first off, we'd have to ask all contributors to agree to it right? But something I can see do-able, is moving away from bootstrap-typeahead.js to horsey which is MIT licensed. [1] > - "visualize/static/visualize.js" is licensed under GNU GPL 2 (assumed to be > "only" because the license notice in the file doesn't tell if there is an > upgrade possibility). This is part of archweb, so GPLv2 > - "mirrors/static/mirror_status.js" is licensed under GNU GPL 2 (assumed to > be "only" because the license notice in the file doesn't tell if there is an > upgrade possibility). This is part of archweb, so GPLv2 [1] https://github.com/bevacqua/horsey -- Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
