On 2/7/19 6:17 AM, james harvey via arch-projects wrote: > It could be worth a developer diff'ing: > * pacman::makepkg.conf and devtools::makepkg-x86_64.conf > * pacman::pacman.conf and devtools::pacman*.conf > > When trying to figure out my /etc/ vs /usr/share/devtools/ confusion > with MAKEFLAGS, I saw these differ in more areas than I would have > expected. > > I don't know if any of the differences matter in the end, but I think > it's nice they almost match, and I think it would be nicer if they > only differ in areas where they need to. > > They probably used to match better, and diverged in a few areas where > they didn't need to.
The conf files in question do not get synced as frequently as pacman updates them. :) it's essentially a pristine copy of the unmodified makepkg.conf from the pacman package, and should never differ. > Some of the differences are certainly nitpicky. pacman just dropped > "-fstack-protector-strong" since it's enabled by default. > https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/54736 > > Others might matter in some situations, like different options on > DLAGENTS. (I'm assuming it's right to have file:// missing from > devtools, talkinga bout the curl options.) Huh, I was trying to think if this matters, since makechrootpkg explicitly verifies sources outside the chroot, but it does so by calling makepkg --config $copydir/etc/makepkg.conf > devtools gives package options "!optipng !upx". > > devtools has a different comment for XferCommand and IgnorePkg. > > Stuff like that. > -- Eli Schwartz Bug Wrangler and Trusted User
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature