Hey Dieter, > * clock : default -> maybe make this "unchanged" done.
> * filesystem: (check the installed system, incl fstab) <-- these instructions > are valid for all entries under filesystem, not just "autoprepare" Ok, I've put this instruction together with the filesystem title. (actually, right under it) > * "success" -> clearly tell users only to flag this if everything worked > fine, and they can fill in comments if anything specific failed. I'll do that > * "modules" -> let's also add ext, swap, xfs, jfs and reiserFS. I'll add them to the fixtures, but in the future when it's live you can do this through the /admin/ pages (i.e. http://localhost:8000/admin/) > * Rollback section -> let's remove the select button, it's a bit redundant. > Instead you can put the text "If you did a rollback followed by a new attempt > to setup your blockdevices/filesystems, select which option you took here" > * make it more clear users should fill in the "rollback modules" section only > if they did a rollback. > you can then also remove the (useless?) rollback part that has yes/no but no > dates, on the main page. I'll remove it, and on the main page as well. Those 2 fields on the main page used to show the last success or fail names, but after I changed the database around they stopped doing this, I probably didn't update their specific logic. > * the two modules checklists should come before success/comments. i.e. > success/comments should be the last thing on the page. Yeah I was thinking that too, I didn't get around to doing this yet, but I will. > * after i hit submit, i saw again the http://localhost:8000/isotests/ page, > but everything was still "never failed" / "never succeeded". > then i reloaded the page and saw the results of my input? that's strange, I haven't had this problem so far. > either way, it would be useful to tell the user, after submitting "thanks, > submission worked", or the same form again with the reasons why the > submission failed (i believe they call this form validation [feedback]) Form validation is already graciously provided (up to a point) by django itself, if you hit submit without filling anything in it won't accept it. The succes page is indeed a nice touch, I'll add it. > * I didn't select any modules in the rollback modules part, but the mainpage > shows successes for the same modules as the ones I flagged in the regular > "modules" checklist. strange, I'll look into this, maybe I made a typo. > * add some links between all the pages. I know you said you would like it to > be nicely themed and everything, and I think that's a good idea, but that > shouldn't be a blocking factor, for all I care you can make the links as ugly > as they can get [for now], as long as they work. You are absolutely right, I need to stop being stopped by such silly things. > * in the success/failed colums of /isotests/, if they are filled in (with an > isoname) I want that isoname to be a link, so that when I click on it, I see > a list of all feedbacks from users of this specific point. For example it > would look like: > > Results for : image boot: optical > > iso - nickname - success? > 2011.03.23 - Dieterbe - Y > 2011.03.13 - Tom - N > (...) Very nice, I'll get on it! Sorry I didn't reply before, I've worked on bits and pieces, but I didn't know what to send when. Expect to hear from me again very soon. Tom
