On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:17:24 -0400 Jeremiah Dodds <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Dieter Plaetinck > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > for anyone who tries to contribute. the git workflow just is more > > cumbersome (you need to fork, fix, make a patch and mail it, or > > publish code, do a pull request, etc) > > > > > As far as I can tell, that's a pretty uncommon opinion, or rather > even if it is "more cumbersome", it tends to *encourage* contribution > as opposed to otherwise. Github is hugely successful, for instance. I > can't imagine many people finding it much more cumbersome than > figuring out how to make a contribution to, well, any project. Well, don't forget we're talking about contributing typo fixes, or a few lines of text. The git thing IS an overhead AND confuses people because it's not what you expect on the wiki. Dieter
