On 08/11/2011 05:42 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 19:13:18 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi<[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/10/2011 04:01 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
Hi,
I see there are two directories with packages:
/repo/any -> contains packages for "any" architecture
/repo/pkg -> contains arch specific packages (i.e. i686 on an i686
live cd) plus symlinks to all files in /repo/any
my questions: why do you name the directory /repo/pkg and not
something like /repo/i686 ? specifying the architecture seems more
sensible and consistent to me. Also, since these images are the
copies of what's in core, why not use the name "core" in there
somewhere? like /repo/core-any and /repo/core-i686 or even better..
why not follow the same convention as used on our mirrors? that
seems like the cleanest. then it would be /repo/core/os/any
and /repo/core/os/i686 (not sure why the 'os' subdir is needed
though)
Dieter
Please decide what pathnames like for both directories, I will change
them ;)
apparently 'os' is deprecated.
So:
/repo/core/any
/repo/core/$arch (i686 or x86_64 depending on which live environment,
maybe the dual images can even have them both?)
Dieter
OK.
Dual images mount only one architecture at time. My initial
implementation of dual-images also support x86_64(kernel) /
i686(userspace) but was removed (adding a second isomounts), in this
case is valid to mount both.
--
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
\cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1
