On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 13:10:13 -0300 Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 01:06 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > > Am 28.11.2011 17:02, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: > >> OK: Just for confirmation, what your want is this inside a tarball: > >> > >> $ tree arch -I syslinux > >> arch > >> ├── aitab > >> ├── any > >> │ └── usr-share.fs.sfs > >> ├── boot > >> │ ├── i686 > >> │ │ ├── archiso.img > >> │ │ └── vmlinuz > >> │ ├── memtest > >> │ ├── memtest.COPYING > >> │ └── x86_64 > >> │ ├── archiso.img > >> │ └── vmlinuz > >> ├── checksum.i686.md5 > >> ├── checksum.x86_64.md5 > >> ├── i686 > >> │ ├── lib-modules.fs.sfs > >> │ └── root-image.fs.sfs > >> └── x86_64 > >> ├── lib-modules.fs.sfs > >> └── root-image.fs.sfs > >> > >> (remove memtest?) > >> > >> It can be done in config/releng/build.sh. > > Exactly, remove memtest. What I need in the end is this extracted > > as a subfolder of http://releng.archlinux.org/isos/$VERSION/. As > > stated in another post, this could also be done in the releng > > script, by extracting the netinstall-dual ISO with bsdtar. I don't > > know which way to prefer, as long as the files are there in the end. > > > Yes. Waiting for Dieter answer. But I think making a tarball is a bit > reduntant, anyway releng scripts should extract it in the correct > location. > yes, it seems trivial to script the extracting of an iso in the releng scripts. however, since this effectively produces another "installation medium" I think it makes more sense to perform this in build.sh (or whatever); this also makes it easier for others who want to build the same end-product (the dir with files) themselves. Dieter
