Am 15.12.2011 11:26, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > On Wed, 14 Dec 2011 23:09:22 -0300 > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/14/2011 09:09 PM, Thomas Bächler wrote: >>> I am not sure what happened in AIF, but archiso has seen some >>> improvements. Should we push out a Christmas Release with the >>> latest stuff? >>> >>> Once the pacman 4/signing stuff is finished and in core, tweaks to >>> AIF will be needed which will probably delay another release, so >>> better do one now, before that happens. >>> >>> What do you guys think? >>> >> >> Sounds good. At least we have two major features from end-user-pov in >> archiso: persistence and http/nfs in pxe (plus much more >> pxe-easy-setup) >> > > I thought the signing stuff is getting close now?
Exactly, but that's going to delay the next release. > I would just do one new release that brings all archiso improvements along > with a few aif fixes and the signing stuff. Doing yet another release directly after the signing stuff is done shouldn't be a problem. But if we hit problems and need to delay, we still have a fairly recent snapshot and can thus take our time. > as for what's on the plate for AIF, check out: > https://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?do=index&project=6&status[]=open > esp. the things labeled critical and high should be taken care of. Any regressions compared to the previous release? > also, what needs to be first? pacman4/signing stuff in core, or new release? > i thought we needed an archiso release with the signing stuff enabled before > we could move pacman4/signing stuff to core. but i'm not sure why. Once pacman 4 goes to core, we need signing in archiso and AIF. The archiso part is rather easy (set up a keyring for the live environment), the AIF part is harder
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
