On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 21:26, Dieter Plaetinck <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 12:41:35 -0300 > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 04/06/2012 12:12 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> > On Fri, 06 Apr 2012 11:48:27 -0300 >> > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi<[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> >> On 04/06/2012 11:24 AM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: >> >>> in the releng env >> >>> (http://projects.archlinux.org/users/dieter/releng.git/tree/) it seems >> >>> the >> >>> pacman.conf.{i686,x86_64} files are now being ignored. (i enabled >> >>> testing in there but it's not used) >> >>> Frankly I don't even know/remember how this ever worked, I can't find a >> >>> reference to these files anywhere. >> >>> How does one control which pacman.conf archiso must use during building >> >>> of the arch environment it puts on the isos? >> >>> >> >>> Dieter >> >>> >> >> I do not know about how these scripts works, the only thing that I can >> >> say is about archiso: >> >> build.sh (wrapper to mkarchiso) does not have a parameter to set a >> >> pacman.conf, so mkarchiso by default will use /etc/pacman.conf. >> > has this always been like this? >> Yes, never used neither in the age of Makefile instead of build.sh. At >> some point we used a local copy of pacman.conf in overlay (unmodified >> from pacman package when mkarchroot does not support NOCOPY) >> > >> >> Can you point me where is supposed to be used these files in >> >> releng-scripts? I can not found any references in the tree. >> >> >> > exactly, that's what I said. I don't know where these files are ever >> > used. They should be used when building the iso's. >> > >> Weird. sure? >> >> But think that these files are never used, because: >> >> They are out-of-date (compared to newer pacman.conf) -> There are no >> "SigLevel" -> Default "SigLevel" is used, that is "Optional TrustedOnly" >> by pacman-4 -> without manual interaction pacman will not work. -> no ISOs. >> >> But we have ISOs all times :) Or I am missing something? >> > > these files date back to back when Gerhard and I were working on the env. > I.e. multiple years ago. > At some point, they must have been used for something.
So finally is there any iso build with testing repo enabled? - Keshav
