On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 22:20:02 +0300 Ionut Biru <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 08/07/2012 07:10 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote: > > On Tue, 07 Aug 2012 18:01:43 +0200 > > Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Am 07.08.2012 17:45, schrieb Dieter Plaetinck: > >>>>> anyway, i wanted to do "transfer ownership" in github, but it complains > >>>>> because > >>>>> "jdodds/aif already exists" > >>>>> so i'ld suggest you remove your aif repo on github (of course keep your > >>>>> commits locally so you don't loose anything), then i'll transfer > >>>>> ownership. > >>>> > >>>> Done. I'll do my best to take good care of AIF. > >>> > >>> i requested the transfer with github. good luck, and if you have any > >>> questions, don't hesitate to get in touch, i'll try to provide feedback > >>> where I can (but you can take it in the direction you want) > >> > >> At some point, I'd like to transfer the permissions to the official AIF > >> repo on archlinux.org. I won't do that until I see some work done > >> though. Until then, ask an Arch developer to pull your github. > >> > >> > > > > the way I saw it, Jeremiah would become the primary maintainer (in his > > github repo) > > and we remove http://projects.archlinux.org/aif.git/ > > quite frankly, that repo has done nothing but causing confusion. I've > > always preferred github. > > > > now you're basically saying "arch linux developers" are the new aif > > maintainer. that's fine by me too. > > I didn't expect any arch devs to be interested in the burden of maintaining > > aif. > > > > Dieter > > > > In my opinion, I see this confusion the primary reason nobody > contributes to AIF. > > Is AIF an arch project or not? > > If is in arch project, then our users should use our bugtracker to > report bugs, use arch-releng to send patches. > > If not, then why we are discussion this here? > it was. now it's not anymore. because i was the only dev who worked on it and i resigned.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
