On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:33:20AM +0100, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 13.03.2013 00:32, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: > > On 03/12/2013 03:24 PM, Hans Spath wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> according to > >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archiso/ > >> archiso is licensed under "GPL". > >> > >> Is that correct? What version? v1? v2? v2 or any later? v3? > >> > >> Regards, > >> Hans Spath > >> > > > > Hi > > > > I guess is GPL2. > > > > @Arch-Releng: right? > > I think nobody ever cared about licensing. As it is, the archiso tree > contains no license statement. I'd just use "GPL2 or later", but I don't > know what the implications are. Or, as the number of authors is small, > just ask everyone to relicense as WTFPL? >
I would suggest using a license which has a legal history, instead of one of a one-off written by someone who likely isn't a lawyer, and whose license hasn't been vetted by one.
