Thank you for your reply, Aaron.

That definitely describes very clearly the reasons why, and after i got an 
answer of madwifi developers, they don't think their driver is ready for a 
release yet.

Though i havn't got an answer on the question what is missing till it will be 
ready for a release.

Thank you for your reply.

Kind Regards,
Grabler Georg

On Friday 23 September 2005 19:50, Aaron Griffin wrote:
> In addition, madwifi does not "release" anything - the entire codebase
> is in cvs with no releases ever:
> http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=82936
>
> This is just flat out terrible form.  It says quite a few things about
> the developers which I won't go into just yet - but in order to
> properly maintain the arch package, in a bleeding edge fashion, we're
> going to have to build nightly madwifi packages.  That's just dumb.
> There's also a little unspoken policy that official packages should
> not be cvs/svn/source control based, but have real tarballs behind
> them.
>
> So, complain to the madwifi people.  I'm sure if they released one
> tarball, we'd have an official package.... But as it stands, you want
> someone to release "madwifi-0.0.0"
>
> On 9/23/05, Celti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's in unsupported because no TU has either the time, equipment, or
> > inclination to pick up the package and maintain it. unsupported is not
> > packages that don't work with Arch, it's just packages that are
> > uploaded by people in the arch community, and not maintained by a TU
> > or a dev.
> >
> > On 9/23/05, Georg Grabler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've bought a madwifi card today, and basically have no problem
> > > rebuilding the driver every time again.
> > >
> > > But why is it unsupported and not in community?
> > >
> > > The madwifi driver is not less beta than the ipw2100/ipw2200 driver is,
> > > and till now worked flawlessly with any atheros card i have had (11mbit
> > > - 108 mbit were all atheros cards, since it seems as if it is the only
> > > widespread chipset used on PCI cards, the few prism cards wich are
> > > around arn't really realistic).
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Grabler Georg
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > arch mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >
> > ~ Patrick Burroughs
> > A.K.A. 'Celti'
> > AIM: nCelti
> > ICQ: 209670498
> > Yahoo!: nCelti
> > Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Google Talk: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to