You are nitpicking. Please let me re-phrase :
No docs unless it fufills one of the criteria below. Have a nice day. Very best regards; Bob Finch > Hello, > > if so MANY people is whining, maybe something IS WRONG? And nobody asks > about "docs being part of a package", but about docs being a separate > package. I would like such doc packages, too. > > Kz. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> It has already been discussed at least two times in the past couple of >> years or so. And NOTHING has changed accept the names of the folks >> whining. >> >> Bottom line: Judd does not like docs being part of a package UNLESS >> they are help files required by a gui-based app., man pages, or not >> available anywhere else (including the web). > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
