Georg Grabler wrote: > On Monday 28 November 2005 10:20, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > >>Well, fair enough but as I already said, he could update it as often as >>he likes if it was pkg'ed separately. I think most people have to do >>the .pacnew tango when they update their initscripts and that's >>frustrating when the scripts themselves have not changed at all. > > > I didn't see a reason at all to update to the .pacnew files all the time. > > Some day i feel like looking over the files i do... sometimes there are good > changes in which i adobt, like the new network profiles (thanks in this case > again for this great update).
Well, fair enough but if you are not running, for example, the latest rc.sysinit then what is the point of updating initscripts at all?! > > I dont feel threatened to update all my files everytime i see there has been > addad a .pacnew file, since this updates won't corrupt the system. > > Regards, > Grabler Georg > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
