On 3/25/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've read a review. Apparently it gives you a choice of nano or vi for edting > start up files. The claim that it could be set up by novices was rebutted. > > So, it is a clone in some ways. Their updating system was commended. My guess > is that it is a modified apt-get, because straight apt-get could never be > commended! >
I checked it out, their package manager is self written, written mainly in bash and a tiny bit of perl and uses xml for its databases. It uses tar.7z and tar.gz for the file formats. The distro seems to be based heavily on LFS, and they mention that. There is nothing at all from Arch in use in their distro apart from our description. James -- iphitus - ArchCK Maintainer, Arch Trusted User, Arch Developer. Home:iphitus.loudas.com _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
