2006/4/13, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Take note that EXA will screw up most things using the released ATI > drivers. EXA is slower than XAA at this moment, it's even slower than > rendering without renderAccel at all.
It doesn't work very well with ati and fglrx drivers, but I can't say the same thing for radeon, and I'm talking about the 92x0 chipset, which I have too. This is because EXA's main developer owns a 9200, so it's the best tested chipset. I didn't have any performance issues, and glxgears is stable around 750 fps... However, on a 9700 mobile (chipset M10) it is slow and buggy, so you're right. > I'm running with a CVS snapshot from the 1.0 CVS branch, which works > quite well now. The fixed all the rendering bugs, but EXA is even slower > now. Maybe I'll take a look if I have the time. Do you have any PKGBUILDs to share, or pointers to documentation about how to make up the whole thing? bardo _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
