Johannes Held wrote: > Hi all, > > I did a pacman -Syu just to knew what needs to be updated. > This question confuses me: > :: Replace unionfs with kernel26 from "current"? [Y/n] > > I think I compiled unionfs by myself: > :: unionfs: local (20060916.2203-2) appears to be newer than repo > (extra/1.5pre_cvs200612261700-1) > > > Should I replace unionfs? I'm currently using kernel26-beyond. > The latest unionfs (for kernel 2.6.20) cannot be compiled outside of the kernel as a module. The latest stock kernel package supplies the unionfs module, so there is no need (as well as no possibility) for a separate unionfs package. The beyond kernel has always had its own unionfs module. So, yes, let the unionfs package float off to the great bit bucket in the sky.
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
