2007/8/1, Doualot Nicolas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2 days ago, solstice made a post > [http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch/2007-July/015102.html] about such > breaking update, it's look like nothing change. One more time a > possibly upgrade which can break other packages has thrown his way into > current... > > Why isn't this packages gone to testing *before* ?? > What does testing good for, if not for such upgrade ?? > > Furthermore, just a message on the dev-(public-)list, but no words on > the main-page to warn users... > > There is something going bad with arch nowadays :/ > > > ----- Message Transféré ----- > > > > Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 09:27:32 -0400 > > De: Paul Mattal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > À: Public mailing list for ArchLinux development > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sujet: [arch-dev-public] new flac > > > > > > New flac is up in [current]. This is a major version update, so > > packages linked against may need to be bumped/rebuilt. > > > > - P > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch-dev-public mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-dev-public > > > > P.S: I don't know if this package really screw up things, but this kind > of message shouldn't happen (I think). >
It does not screws up things http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2007-August/001313.html We're trying to improve our handling of package upgrades and .so bumps checking. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
