Stanto schrieb: > I'm interested in maintaining a package based upon the rt2x00-cvs hourly > tarball supplied by rt2x00. > > However I've noticed that the current rt2x00 in [unstable] has been > abandoned with no maintainer. > > According to the wiki, I shouldn't submit a package to AUR (even though > I intended just an rt2500usb-cvs based package, a part of the rt2x00 > driver set) because it's contents, or similar, are already in [unstable]. > > What can I do about it because currently the rt2x00 package is outdated > and flawed especially with regards to the the rt2500/2570usb adapters?
The problem is that rt2x00 is based on wireless-dev and there are no backports to 2.6.22. Right now, it doesn't build with the 2.6.22 kernel, so there is no point in updating it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch