no my cpu is an amd athlon xp 2400+ so i think that might be a bit old. I am just wanting a vm like virtualbox but using gtk instead of qt.
On 10/16/07, Rodrigo Coacci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 10/16/07, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Jeffrey Parke wrote: > > > If anyone knows of any virtualization programs like virtualbox please > > > tell me. I am wanting something that doesn't use the qt toolkit. other > > > wise i would be using virtual box. > > > > > > > There are a few good ones. Some are free, others is not. > > > > If you want a full paraviritualization try Xen. > > > > If you like virtual box (which is pretty slow) you have qemu. qemu, with > > kqemu, or maybe kvm (I'm not sure how this works). > > > > A non-free one is VMware Server, but its free as in beer. > > > > -- > > chs > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > arch@archlinux.org > > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > I don't know about Xen but qemu works very fine, especially if you have a > somewhat new processor (1 year or so) with the virtualization extensions > (both intel and amd), if so you can use kernel's built-in kvm module and > qemu-kvm. More here: > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Qemu#Using_the_Kernel-based_Virtual_Machine > > Note that you don't need kvm-modules package anymore as the kvm modules > are already in kernel. > > -- > Abraços, > Rodrigo > > A computer is like air conditioning: it becomes useless when you open > windows. > ~Linus Torvalds > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > >
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
