On Sun, 18 Nov 2007, Scott Horowitz wrote: > On Nov 17, 2007 11:54 PM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> but without formatting >> and not taking in account the fact that the package version can be >> different for the 2 archtectures (because of arch specific bug). > > I'm not sure what you're referring to here. Can you elaborate? > > I simply check the architectures specified in the PKGBUILDs and make > sure that package exists in the arch's repo. It wasn't meant to be > some sort of x86_64 specified check, that just arose out of it. More > importantly, it shows that other arch's are currently just fine :) > > Scott >
For example, your script say that valgrind-3.2.3-2 is missing in extra/os/x86_64 but in fact the valgrind package for x86_64 is at version 3.2.3-2.1 . The -2 package for x86_64 had to be fixed and that fix was not necessary for the i686 package. So the pkgrel was bumped from -2 to -2.1 Your script seems to indicate a problem when there are none. If you want your script to take such things into account, you'll need to also checkout the abs tree for Arch64. For that, add -64 to the tags in the supfiles in /etc/abs/ and change your ABSROOT to not clobber your i686 abs tree. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
