Hi Scott, > Thanks Cesar, I'm working on integrating it (you had added it into an > older version of the script :p). I'll probably use a passed argument > to generate the dependency tree image so people don't need pydot to > run the rest of the script.
You're right, that's better :-) > Also, how long does it take to generate the image? I waited >15 > minutes and then gave up. Did I screw up my integration of the code or > does it simply take a long time? Strange... it takes about 10 seconds @ 3 Ghz to generate the svg image (using the core/base and core/extra repositories). > I'll hopefully post an updated version in the next couple of days, > just have a few other things to improve. Take your time. I've tried to implement a depth-first search to find cycles in the repository graph structure, but yours is working better and faster, so I gave up :-) > Ok nevermind, it simply takes a while. I must've stopped just short of > the generation, it takes ~18 minutes here. > Now to figure out why it generates a blank png file... That's unusual! Can you send me the code? I'll run the same script you're working on and time the results. You could also uncomment those 3 lines in function visualize_repo to save to disk the output string used by pydot and try it manually with graphviz: $dot output.dot -Tpng -o dependency_tree.png Let me know how it goes! []'s Cesar On Nov 23, 2007 4:56 PM, Scott Horowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 22, 2007 5:45 PM, Cesar G. Miguel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > @Scott: please fell free to merge the differences and distribute. > > There are probably some minor bugs yet. > > Thanks Cesar, I'm working on integrating it (you had added it into an > older version of the script :p). I'll probably use a passed argument > to generate the dependency tree image so people don't need pydot to > run the rest of the script. > > Also, how long does it take to generate the image? I waited >15 > minutes and then gave up. Did I screw up my integration of the code or > does it simply take a long time? > > I'll hopefully post an updated version in the next couple of days, > just have a few other things to improve. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
