Hi,
On 08/27/2012 10:31 PM, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On 08/26/2012 12:07 AM, Livnat Peer wrote:
On 24/08/12 19:29, Dave Neary wrote:
So - here's my suggestion for that (and as per my suggestion, let's have
this discussion here, and when we reach a consensus ask for the opinion
of the board):
users@ - User issues
<snip>
arch@ - rename to developers@ - This will be the key developer mailing
list for oVirt
<snip>
board@ - Issues related to the non-technical governance of the project
<snip>
infra@ - issues related to the management of oVirt infrastructure
<snip>
vdsm-devel, node-devel, engine-devel, *-devel: Low-traffic lists related
to the specific implementation issues of the individual components.
<snip>
How does that sound? Does anyone have other/better suggestions?
+1, I think this is a good proposal.
I would try to avoid discussing patches on the developers list and try
to keep it more high level like design discussions etc.
+1 Yes, that makes sense - keep patch discussions in the project, and
keep discussions that affect oVirt overall on the developers list.
Also, I'm +1 to renaming this list; I reckon arch@ is confusing, dev@ or
developers@ is a more common Big Main List name.
It seems this has broad support - can we add it to the agenda for the
weekly meeting this week to give people one last chance to have a say,
and (assuming there is no major opposition) make it so?
Thanks,
Dave.
--
Dave Neary
Community Action and Impact
Open Source and Standards, Red Hat
Ph: +33 9 50 71 55 62 / Cell: +33 6 77 01 92 13
_______________________________________________
Arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
