Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 08:44 -0400 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Fabian Deutsch" <fabi...@redhat.com> > > To: "Alon Bar-Lev" <alo...@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Barak Azulay" <bazu...@redhat.com>, arch@ovirt.org, "Douglas Landgraf" > > <dland...@redhat.com>, "node-devel" > > <node-de...@ovirt.org> > > Sent: Monday, March 31, 2014 3:34:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [node-devel] Versioning of oVirt Node > > > > > > Am Montag, den 31.03.2014, 07:57 -0400 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > > > > > > > > > > I don't mind moving to our own tiny distro as long as it's a > > > single > > > > > image to release and maintain > > > > > > > > Well, Node _is_ actually a tiny distro, just based on some package > > > based > > > > on some existing one. > > > > > > I do not think that it is tiny distro... but let's not get into this > > > argument :) > > > > Hehe ;) > > > > > > > > > > > The effort of maintaining multiple ovirt-nodes based on distro and > > > > > distro-version and ovirt-version creates an unmanageable test > > > matrix > > > > > that all the community might loose from > > > > > > > > I partially agree here. > > > > From my POV the Fedora based Node is very useful for us to develop > > > Node, > > > > sooner or later the changes we've got in Fedora will land in CentOS, > > > > thus devleoping on Fedora is a preparation for being able to deliver > > > a > > > > (stable) CentOS based Node. > > > > > > > > So IMO we should continue to develop on Fedora, but we might want to > > > > consider to keep to only deliver the CentOS based Node. > > > > The Fedora based build could be seen as nightlies. > > > > > > If we consider single base distribution (aka blackbox which is not > > > black at all...), and you agree that centos is a fit, I do not see any > > > reason to invest resources in fedora. > > > > In the light of man power it makes sense to only support one Node - > > (as in delivering releases and providing support) which we currently do. > > > > From the development point of view, we should continue to develop features > > on > > Fedora. > > Why? if we release only centos, why do we need features for fedora?
Mainly to prepare for major CentOS releases. Take CentOS 7 for example. We know that it is derived from Fedora 19 or so, thus adding Fedora 19 support, will also help us with CentOS 7. - fabian
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Arch mailing list Arch@ovirt.org http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch