Hi both, I think this is an example where the CRM-Inf extension would come in handy. See http://www.cidoc-crm.org/crminf/
Phil Phil Carlisle Knowledge Organization Specialist Listing Group, Historic England Direct Dial: +44 (0)1793 414824 http://thesaurus.historicengland.org.uk/ http://www.heritagedata.org/blog/ Listing Information Services fosters an environment where colleagues are valued for their skills and knowledge, and where communication, customer focus and working in partnership are at the heart of everything we do. From: archesproject@googlegroups.com [mailto:archesproject@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Lee, Edmund Sent: 12 January 2017 11:03 To: Arches Project Subject: [Arches] Re: Resource graph - Related resources for node Fascinating request Vince, thanks for raising it - I'd be interested to see how Arches handles this use case as well. It's a common heritage issue - either competing or equally valid interpretations of a given artefact or site based on the (always) limited evidence that archaeology provides. From my recording experience (way back when) a typical problem might be that aerial photography has identified a site as a crop-mark, but we don't have any dating evidence (so in the U.K. it could date from anywhere between say 4000 BCE or 2000 CE). It could be an IRON AGE / DEFENDED ENCLOSURE, or it could equally be a MID TWENTIETH CENTURY / ANTI AIRCRAFT BATTERY (a rather extreme example, but possible). For a user coming to that record, it would be helpful to have insight into which authority had suggested which interpretation. Ed On Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 10:41:41 PM UTC, Vincent Meijer wrote: Hi all, I am working on an idea I have to record all interpretations made regarding a specific (heritage) resource. I would like to relate the assignment of e.g. a cultural period or the use/type of an object (hide scraper, spear head, vase) or an object category (defensive structures, tools, jewelry) to an authority. This authority can be an actor or a (to be created) academic reference, both resource graph types, rather than values in a regular dropdown/authority document. I want this in particular because it is easier for my users to create a new resource than it is to add values to dropdowns via RDM. Also it seems to me that using the type of search queries CIDOC encourages (find unexpected relationships) would work better this way. I came up with the following addition to HERITAGE_RESOURCE.E18 (new nodes are the ones sticking out in the top) for HERITAGE_RESOURCE_USE_TYPE_ASSIGNMENT.E17: (ASSIGNMENT_AUTHORITY.E39 would hold a foreign key to the related resource.) (Full res: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5r8wxmmppbQNTdGczg3cXZMLTg/view ) [https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-qS5UO8cItIQ/WHazcQBUrnI/AAAAAAABZfY/iVt0P9ofQMAjjU66iKeTSxtMzna_TagigCLcB/s1600/HERITAGE_RESOURCE.E18.png]<https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5r8wxmmppbQNTdGczg3cXZMLTg/view> My question is: has anybody done this type of relations before or has an idea how to do it? Arches is currently written to have only relations between two complete resources, not between a node of a resource and a complete resource. I get the feeling I should override the create_resource_relationship() function in Arches' resource.py, but perhaps I'm looking at it the wrong way. Thank you in advance for any suggestions, Vincent -- -- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com<mailto:archesproject@googlegroups.com>. To unsubscribe, send email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<mailto:archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. [Historic England Logo]<http://www.historicengland.org.uk/> We help people understand, enjoy and value the historic environment, and protect it for the future. Historic England<http://bit.ly/1OuxROd> is a public body, and we champion everyone’s heritage, across England. Follow us: Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/HistoricEngland> | Twitter<https://twitter.com/HistoricEngland> | Instagram<https://www.instagram.com/historicengland/> Sign up to our newsletter<http://bit.ly/1p49z1e> For the first time, we are opening up The List asking people to share images, insights and secrets of these special historic places to capture them for future generations. Can you help us #ListEngland? <https://historicengland.org.uk/listing/enrich-the-list/> This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of Historic England unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system and notify the sender immediately. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it. Any information sent to Historic England may become publicly available. -- -- To post, send email to archesproject@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe, send email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to archesproject+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
