On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Srinath Perera <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please let me know. Also it is OK to ask for a review/discussion if you > are start working on a topic > I think it is important to review the BAM presentation layer strategy. The BAM server it self has two things for this. Using jaggery based dash boards and Gadgets. Later option is not supported via tool box. However both these options provide very low level frame work for users. Another option suggested is to use third party BI tools like phentaho, gooddata etc ... Another option is UES. If we look at data receiving and analysis parts we have solid answers for them and there is only one answer. Therefore it is better to have one approach which can address all problems. Recently I did an onsite work with BAM and it is very confusing to think what to use. Another topic is the security frame work usage with jaggery. Currently it sees we can not use existing authenticators with jaggery applications. thanks, Amila. > > --Srinath > > -- > ============================ > Srinath Perera, Ph.D. > Director, Research, WSO2 Inc. > Visiting Faculty, University of Moratuwa > Member, Apache Software Foundation > Research Scientist, Lanka Software Foundation > Blog: http://srinathsview.blogspot.com/ > Photos: http://www.flickr.com/photos/hemapani/ > Phone: 0772360902 > > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > > -- *Amila Suriarachchi* Software Architect WSO2 Inc. ; http://wso2.com lean . enterprise . middleware phone : +94 71 3082805
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
