Hi all,

Since we don't have any other ways to overcome this issue, I'm going with
the solution by implementing a method to remove the registry cache as
Shazni mentioned in the link. So before we doing a write call to the SM
registry we will call this method to clear the cache for the particular
path from AF registry.

Thanks.



Mahendran Pirinthapan
Software Engineer | WSO2 Inc.
Mobile +94772378732.

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Amal Gunatilake <am...@wso2.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The global cache invalidation implementation is complete long time ago and
> the documentation can be found at [1]. This has been tested in registry and
> it's working well. However this is implemented to support from carbon 4.3.0
> onwards.
>
> [1]
> https://docs.google.com/a/wso2.com/document/d/1yWE-3FfWaM2hKS6kqtb8uDR8o9szBH9qQjkPZqWJmPc
>
> Thank you,
> Amal.
>
>
> Thank you  & Best regards,
>
> *Amal Gunatilake*
>  Software Engineer
> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Shazni Nazeer <sha...@wso2.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Given that we know the registry path of the resource of which cache to be
>> deleted and have an instance of the registry we can manually delete the
>> cache with a method like removeCache in the below file. However, it's not a
>> clean or correct way of manipulating the registry cache.
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/wso2-dev/carbon-governance/blob/master/components/governance/org.wso2.carbon.governance.custom.lifecycles.checklist/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/governance/custom/lifecycles/checklist/util/LifecycleBeanPopulator.java
>>
>> Shazni Nazeer
>>
>> Senior Software Engineer
>>
>> Mob : +94 777737331
>> LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer
>> Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <dimut...@wso2.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Pulasthi,
>>>
>>> So when we are doing global invalidation, what is the method we are
>>> going to use to invalidate the cache within the JVM? :) Or are you going to
>>> do it by magic?
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> dimuthu
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Pulasthi Supun <pulas...@wso2.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Dimuthu,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 4:17 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <dimut...@wso2.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Pulasthi Supun <pulas...@wso2.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Dimuthu,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 2:05 PM, Dimuthu Leelarathne <
>>>>>> dimut...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Pulasthi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes. We do not need  global invalidation (although it would solve
>>>>>>> the problem), but the request is to sink AF Registry cache with the DB. 
>>>>>>> We
>>>>>>> are in the same JVM, and we need a method/way to tell registry remove 
>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>> particular path from Registry path cache.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Such a method would need to be accessed through something like the
>>>>>> remote registry right?. The Registry api does not provide such a method 
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> remove entries from the Registry cache.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It should not be remote. An OSGi level method would be fine. Is there
>>>>> a way to patch the registry that we use?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I talked with Azeez regarding this. He also agrees that providing such
>>>> a method to manipulate the cache is wrong. We need to think of some other
>>>> solution for this. I am not sure if the global cache invalidation has
>>>> completed or can be backported into 4.2.0.
>>>> @Amal is the work on that complete ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Pulasthi
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Pulasthi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>> dimuthu
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Pulasthi Supun <pulas...@wso2.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From what i understand the AF and SM are in different domains that
>>>>>>>> is why distributed caching will not be able to handle this scenario 
>>>>>>>> right?.
>>>>>>>> global cluster cache invalidation has been done with the use of a pub 
>>>>>>>> sub
>>>>>>>> mechanism ( discussed in archi under "Global cluster cache invalidation
>>>>>>>> code review Notes" ) but this will only be available in the next 
>>>>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> AFAIK.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Pulasthi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Amalka Subasinghe <
>>>>>>>> ama...@wso2.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The scenario is, we have mounted SM's registry to the App Factory
>>>>>>>>> registry to remove the remote call for read the resources. but still 
>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> write calls happens via SM. see the image below.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ​
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The problem is, once we do a write call to the SM's registry, App
>>>>>>>>> Factory registry cache won't get updated, so old information will be 
>>>>>>>>> shown
>>>>>>>>> in App Factory pages.
>>>>>>>>> Is there a way to remove an entry from the App Factory registry
>>>>>>>>> cache when we do a write call to the SM's registry? then when we do a 
>>>>>>>>> read
>>>>>>>>> call, it will load the cache again and show the updated information.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>> Amalka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Architecture mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Architecture@wso2.org
>>>>>>>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Pulasthi Supun
>>>>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com,
>>>>>>>> Email: pulas...@wso2.com
>>>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 9258281
>>>>>>>> Blog : http://pulasthisupun.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>> Git hub profile: https://github.com/pulasthi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>>>> email: dimut...@wso2.com
>>>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Pulasthi Supun
>>>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com,
>>>>>> Email: pulas...@wso2.com
>>>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 9258281
>>>>>> Blog : http://pulasthisupun.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> Git hub profile: https://github.com/pulasthi
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>>>
>>>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>>>> email: dimut...@wso2.com
>>>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>>>
>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Pulasthi Supun
>>>> Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com,
>>>> Email: pulas...@wso2.com
>>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 9258281
>>>> Blog : http://pulasthisupun.blogspot.com/
>>>> Git hub profile: https://github.com/pulasthi
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Dimuthu Leelarathne
>>> Architect & Product Lead of App Factory
>>>
>>> WSO2, Inc. (http://wso2.com)
>>> email: dimut...@wso2.com
>>> Mobile : 0773661935
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> Architecture@wso2.org
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
Architecture@wso2.org
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to