On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 7:43 PM, Prasanna Dangalla <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I need to introduce a new table which is *only* needed for
> carbon-governance. AFAIK currently all the database scripts are in
> carbon-kernel [1]. AFAIU new table should be managed separately in
> carbon-governance with the introduction of  a new prefix like GOV_.
>
> Feedback on this approach is highly appreciated.
>

Here is my generic suggestion, G-Reg is a separate product and has lot more
features than Registry hence it's valid requirement to have own data and
own tables also GOV_ prefix in order to properly distinguish. IMO It is
incorrect to include G-Reg  specific scripts  into carbon-kernel script. We
already have this kind of separation in IS among user-mgt and identity
tables.

Thanks !

>
>
> [1] -
> https://github.com/wso2/carbon4-kernel/tree/master/distribution/kernel/carbon-home/dbscripts
>
> Thanks
> --
> Prasanna Dangalla
> Software Engineer, WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com/
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> cell: +94 777 55 80 30 | +94 718 11 27 51
> twitter: @prasa77
>



-- 
Sagara Gunathunga

Senior Technical Lead; WSO2, Inc.;  http://wso2.com
V.P Apache Web Services;    http://ws.apache.org/
Linkedin; http://www.linkedin.com/in/ssagara
Blog ;  http://ssagara.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to