The proper way to do this with Netty 4 is to use
a io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultEventExecutorGroup. Here's an example of
how to execute a handler using an Executor. In that code segment,
eventExecutor is an implementation
of io.netty.util.concurrent.DefaultEventExecutorGroup.

pipeline.addLast(eventExecutor, "dispatcher", new HttpDispatcher());


On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Kasun Indrasiri <[email protected]> wrote:

> They recommend not to block the EventLoop thread under any circumstances
> [1]. So, the application level logic (mediation/services) needs to be
> handled from a separate thread pool.
>
>
> [1]
> http://normanmaurer.me/presentations/2014-facebook-eng-netty/slides.html#23.0
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:42 PM, Isuru Ranawaka <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I think there are two aspects,  handling connections and handling
>> requests coming through connections. Basically what happens is Threads in
>> BossGroup accepts the incoming connections and after accepting it. It
>> creates a channel pipelines for each connection and handover accepted
>> connections to handle by netty worker threads.
>> So here after IO operations are handle by worker threads. each worker is
>> responsible for handling its pipeline. Requests are coming through that
>> pipe line and through netty handlers we can access those requests . If we
>> use same Netty worker IO thread for handle requests then if one requests
>> takes long processing time then following requests also affected from that
>> which applies back pressure on IO Threads.  So I think we need to handle
>> incoming requests from separate threads  to run netty worker threads
>> smoothly. For Netty 4 on wards they have mentioned that we can share same
>> worker pool for boss and worker groups as well.
>>
>> thanks
>> IsuruR
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:14 AM, Ravi Undupitiya <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Netty 5.x is still in alpha and 4.x is current stable.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Shouldn't we be using Netty 5?
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Ravi Undupitiya <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Azeez,
>>>>>
>>>>> The reason for using a worker for executing engine tasks is to avoid
>>>>> using an I/O thread to do the same. AFAIU the pipeline is executed from an
>>>>> I/O thread. However, we might be able to share the existing netty worker
>>>>> pool [1] and place our worker in it. We'll update the code to use this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://netty.io/4.0/api/io/netty/channel/ChannelHandlerContext.html#executor()
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Ravi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:02 AM, Afkham Azeez <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I was going through the code, and in addition to the Netty boss &
>>>>>> worker pools, we have our own worker pool. Why is that? Looks like a
>>>>>> remnant from the old PT architecture but do we really need that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Azeez
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>>>>>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919>blog: *
>>>>>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
>>>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
>>>>>> <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>>>> *linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> *Ravi Undupitiya*
>>>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 http://wso2.com
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *E-mail: [email protected] <http://wso2.com>**M: **+94 772 930 712
>>>>> <%2B94%C2%A0772%20930%20712>*
>>>>>
>>>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> *Afkham Azeez*
>>>> Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
>>>> Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
>>>> * <http://www.apache.org/>*
>>>> *email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
>>>> * cell: +94 77 3320919 <%2B94%2077%203320919>blog: *
>>>> *http://blog.afkham.org* <http://blog.afkham.org>
>>>> *twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
>>>> <http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
>>>> *linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*
>>>>
>>>> *Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Ravi Undupitiya*
>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 http://wso2.com
>>>
>>>
>>> *E-mail: [email protected] <http://wso2.com>**M: **+94 772 930 712
>>> <%2B94%C2%A0772%20930%20712>*
>>>
>>> Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Architecture mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards
>> Isuru Ranawaka
>> M: +94714629880
>> Blog : http://isurur.blogspot.com/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Architecture mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Kasun Indrasiri
> Software Architect
> WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
> lean.enterprise.middleware
>
> cell: +94 77 556 5206
> Blog : http://kasunpanorama.blogspot.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Architecture mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
>
>


-- 
*Afkham Azeez*
Director of Architecture; WSO2, Inc.; http://wso2.com
Member; Apache Software Foundation; http://www.apache.org/
* <http://www.apache.org/>*
*email: **[email protected]* <[email protected]>
* cell: +94 77 3320919blog: **http://blog.afkham.org*
<http://blog.afkham.org>
*twitter: **http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez*
<http://twitter.com/afkham_azeez>
*linked-in: **http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez
<http://lk.linkedin.com/in/afkhamazeez>*

*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware*
_______________________________________________
Architecture mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture

Reply via email to