Hi Johann,
On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Johann Nallathamby <joh...@wso2.com> wrote: > For IS 6.0.0 M3 we decided to implement and manage user lifecycle states. > For IS 6.0.0 M2 we are implementing SCIM 2.0. I propose that we extend SCIM > 2.0 metadata and include the user lifecycle state as a user's metadata. > > Also regarding where we need to store this metadata, I think it needs to > be stored in a column in the UM_USER table. This means we don't have to go > to the identity store to fetch user's state for most of the operations we > will be performing on the user. > > Should we store state and lifecycleId in UM_USER table or IDM_USER table ? Thanks Isura > On a different note I think we also need to merge the SCIM2.0 metadata > table with UM_USER table so that all SCIM 2.0 metadata is supported by our > identity-mgt implementation. This will greatly improve performance and > avoid multiple lookups in database. Similarly we must use UM_GROUP to store > group metadata of SCIM 2.0. > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > > *Johann Dilantha Nallathamby* > Technical Lead & Product Lead of WSO2 Identity Server > Governance Technologies Team > WSO2, Inc. > lean.enterprise.middleware > > Mobile - *+94777776950* > Blog - *http://nallaa.wordpress.com <http://nallaa.wordpress.com>* >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list Architecture@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
