Hi, Thanks for the clarification Wasura.
In C5 we have used *USER_IDENTIFIER* in below APIM tables. AM_USER_NAME_MAPPING AM_API_RATINGS AM_API_COMMENTS But in C5 UM tables we still have used *USER_ID*. AUTH_UM_PASSWORD_INFO AUTH_UM_USER_GROUP AUTH_UM_USER_ATTRIBUTES Is there any particular reason for that? I am +1 to use USER_ID in apim tables as well. Thanks & Regards, Ishara Cooray Senior Software Engineer Mobile : +9477 262 9512 WSO2, Inc. | http://wso2.com/ Lean . Enterprise . Middleware On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 9:17 PM, Wasura Wattearachchi <was...@wso2.com> wrote: > Hi Ishara, > > I agree with you. It is better to have USER_ID rather than > USER_IDENTIFIER. But there is a problem. I checked all the tables in the > database again and found that there are some tables which have > USER_IDENTIFIER column (which is used to symbolize the username of the > current user like in AM_API_COMMENTS table). > So if I change the USER_IDENTIFIER field to USER_ID in my table > (AM_API_COMMENTS) then the consistency of the database will be lost, > because other tables have it as USER_IDENTIFIER while AM_API_COMMENTS has > it as USER_ID. > > So I think it is better to keep it this way as USER_IDENTIFIER without > doing any changes. What are the ideas of others? > > Thanks! > > On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 5:47 AM Ishara Cooray <isha...@wso2.com> wrote: > >> Hi Wasura, >> We can simplify USER_IDENTIFIER field as USER_ID >> >> And also I think we need to categorize comments as "Bug", "Feature >> Request" or "General". By default it should be "General. >> >> What is the way that we identify the category of a particular comment? >> > > > -- > Wasura Wattearachchi > Software Engineer Intern | WSO2 > > Email: was...@wso2.com <t...@wso2.com> > Mobile: +94775396038 >
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list Architecture@wso2.org https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
