Hi Youcef, If you are able to share some high level details about your use case I think we will be in a better position to give specific feedback.
In general, if you have a third party Identity provider and if you use it as KM ([1]), you would not miss any vital features of KM. However, there are many IS features that could be valuable for your use case or any future use cases. Please refer [2]. [1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Configuring+a+Third-Party+Key+Manager [2] https://wso2.com/identity-and-access-management/features/ Thanks, Supun On Sat, Sep 15, 2018 at 5:46 AM Youcef HILEM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am in the design phase of the future architecture of our APIM platform. > Currently we do not deploy IS as KM. > > To not miss something I ask you to know if it is relevant to use IS as KM. > > What are the advantages of using IS as KM for APIM in a context where we > have already tow IDP in our company? > In other words what useful IS features are missing in KM? > > Thanks, > Youcef HILEM > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://wso2-oxygen-tank.10903.n7.nabble.com/WSO2-Architecture-f62919.html > _______________________________________________ > Architecture mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture > -- Supun Malinga
_______________________________________________ Architecture mailing list [email protected] https://mail.wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/architecture
