I'm sharing a set of related files that illustrate our desired outcomes (should 
have included this in the initial posting):

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B6iyjeOLkTS9R2JIUXFleGNnNGM?usp=sharing

You'll see that we want the plug-in to supply the "sort name" rather than have 
AS try to assemble it. This is especially necessary with complex headings. Our 
goal is to create a "sort name" that is an exact match for the authorized 
heading (including the form of punctuation); this is easy accomplished when we 
grab the form directly from the LC MARCXML.

Happy to field other comments or questions.

(NB. I initially sent this to the list last week, but I think it failed to 
post.)


Best,
Francis

--



From: Lapka, Francis
Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:23 PM
To: '[email protected]' 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: LCNAF plugin

As part of a larger project concerning agent and subject records in 
ArchivesSpace, a group at Yale has drafted changes we'd like to see in the 
LCNAF plugin (to be coded by a vendor for use at Yale). The spec is outlined 
here:

https://drive.google.com/open?id=1_Jt0_5_9uuu-YexjfIdzTQEuJo2GjQ88no8WxHBXPlI

There are three tabs. Text in red indicates changes to existing performance of 
the plugin (except for the third tab - where we propose an entirely new mapping 
for lcgft).

Some of what we propose may not be universally desired (e.g., using the LC 
authority URI as AS AuthorityID). Other changes probably ought to be 
incorporated in the LCNAF plugin for all (e.g., don't create separate AS 
subject *records* for each variant form in an LCSH record).

We welcome your corrections, suggestions, or other thoughts.

Thanks,
Francis


Francis Lapka  *  Catalog Librarian
Dept. of Rare Books and Manuscripts
Yale Center for British Art
203.432.9672  *  [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>


_______________________________________________
Archivesspace_Users_Group mailing list
[email protected]
http://lyralists.lyrasis.org/mailman/listinfo/archivesspace_users_group

Reply via email to