Hi. Glad you think this is interesting. I have some code here and there now. In the next couple of days I will consolidate the code into one place - probably some svn sandbox on apache.
BR, Sten Roger Sandvik On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:43 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Sten, > > That sounds really interesting to me. As you can see from the Aries > proposal, there are already plans to provide a URL handler that can turn > web > applications into RFC 66 WABs (Web Application Bundles). The main > difference > between a WAB and a WAR is a number of headers in the MANIFEST.MF. > The deployment model of RFC 66 is such a WAB file and Aries doesn't yet > cater for an extender that understands these WAB files, so I think your > proposed component would be very useful. > > Best regards, > > David Bosschaert > > 2009/9/29 Sten Roger Sandvik <[email protected]> > > > Hi. > > > > First off I would like to give my support to the Aries project. I think > it > > is a really needed project. Looked at some of the talks about RFC66 > > (WebContainer) and my understanding is that you will need some sort of > WAR > > deployer in Aries? Have been working on a RFC66 implementation that can > run > > on any OSGi HttpService. This is around 95% feature complete (except for > > session management) right now. Every web applicaiton deployed is added to > > the HttpService as a servlet where alias = context-path. I am not sure if > > this implementation belongs to Felix or Aries. > > > > What do you guys think? > > > > BR, > > Sten Roger Sandvik > > >
