2009/9/30 David Bosschaert <[email protected]>: > Hi Jeremy, > > I wasn't aware that there was an alternative available at Apache. I've used
And I wasn't aware Hudson was available ... looks nice! > Hudson in Apache before with CXF and really liked it, but I don't really > have a strong preference for it. Anything that builds and runs the tests on > checkin should do the job I think... > > Cheers, > > David > > 2009/9/30 Daniel Kulp <[email protected]> > >> >> http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/ >> >> In anycase, I'll setup a build. >> >> Dan >> >> >> >> On Wed September 30 2009 8:46:07 am Jeremy Hughes wrote: >> > I'm curious about Hudson. I've not used it before. What are the >> > advantages over continuum, which admittedly is something I'm more used >> > to. There is an instance of continuum at vmbuild.apache.org which we >> > could potentially use. I just looked at hudson.dev.java.net ... is >> > there an instance of it running in the apache.org domain or are you >> > suggesting we build at java.net? >> > >> > Jeremy >> > >> > 2009/9/30 David Bosschaert <[email protected]>: >> > > Hi all, >> > > >> > > I've just committed the parent pom structure and updated the Blueprint >> > > component to use it. >> > > You can now run 'mvn install' from the Aries trunk to build everything >> > > (which currently is just blueprint :). >> > > >> > > I guess this would be enough to get a Hudson build going... Anyone with >> > > the right credentials there fancy setting it up? >> > > >> > > Cheers, >> > > >> > > David >> > >> >> -- >> Daniel Kulp >> [email protected] >> http://www.dankulp.com/blog >> >
