Thank you!
On 6 December 2010 14:54, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems waiting until january should be ok. > > On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 15:50, Mark Nuttall <[email protected]> wrote: >> Guillaume, >> Regardless of how we number our components, I am sure that we'll want >> to publish an Aries release in January, post-graduation. Is a December >> release of Karaf imperative, or would the team be willing and able to >> wait another month and pick up our January, post-graduation release? >> >> Many thanks, >> Mark >> >> On 6 December 2010 11:33, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Whenever we talk about a release, we kinda assume a single version >>> number, but I think we set up the build to release components >>> independantly, in which case, each component can be moved to 1.0 as >>> soon as it passes the CT. The incubating flag is unrelated to that I >>> think and we could release 1.0-incubating, and later do a 1.0.1 for >>> example. >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:08, Mark Nuttall <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Fair point. I agree that we should number our releases 0.x until our >>>> components pass the OSGi CTs. >>>> >>>> On that basis, our next release would be "0.3-INCUBATING" in December >>>> or "0.3" in January, depending on Guillaume and the Karaf team's >>>> response. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> On 6 December 2010 10:45, Alasdair Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I don't think we should do a 1.0 release of blueprint, JMX or other >>>>> modules that implement an Enterprise OSGi test until we have them >>>>> passing the OSGi CTs. >>>>> >>>>> Blueprint and JMX both have failures in the 0.2 release and I don't >>>>> know if these issues have been addressed. I will try to run the CTs to >>>>> see what the current situation is. >>>>> >>>>> Alasdair >>>>> >>>>> On 6 December 2010 09:35, Mark Nuttall <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Hi Guillaume, >>>>>> Given that Aries will be graduating mid December, I think we'd all >>>>>> expect there to be a 1.0 release in January. Would the Karaf team be >>>>>> willing to wait a month for that instead? >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Mark >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2 December 2010 22:54, Guillaume Nodet <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> We'd like to have a Karaf 2.2.0 release in December, but we depend on >>>>>>> Aries 0.3-SNAPSHOT. >>>>>>> Any chance we could release something this month ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>> Guillaume Nodet >>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>>>>>> ------------------------ >>>>>>> Open Source SOA >>>>>>> http://fusesource.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Alasdair Nottingham >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, >>> Guillaume Nodet >>> ------------------------ >>> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >>> ------------------------ >>> Open Source SOA >>> http://fusesource.com >>> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
