Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Advisory Council Meeting Results - October 2012 (ARIN)
   2. Draft Policy ARIN-2012-5: Removal of Renumbering Requirement
      for Small Multihomers - Last Call (ARIN)
   3. Draft Policy ARIN-2012-7: Reassignments for Third Party
      Internet Access (TPIA) over Cable - Last Call (ARIN)
   4. Re: Advisory Council Meeting Results - October 2012 (ARIN)
   5. Re: ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer enhancement (David Farmer)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:05:34 -0400
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - October 2012
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process the ARIN Advisory
Council (AC) held a meeting on 26 October 2012 and made decisions about
several draft policies and proposals.

The AC moved the following draft policies to last call (they will be
posted separately to last call):

   ARIN-2012-5: Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
   ARIN-2012-7: Reassignments for Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) 
over Cable

The following remains on the AC's docket:

   ARIN-2012-2: IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement
   ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
   ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

The following proposal was added to the AC's docket for development
and evaluation:

   ARIN-prop-182 Update Residential Customer Definition to not exclude 
wireless as Residential Service

The AC abandoned the following:

   ARIN-prop-180 ISP Private Reassignment

The AC provided the following statement: "The ARIN Advisory Council 
decided to abandon ARIN-prop-180 based on feedback from the community on 
PPML and at the Public Policy Meeting in Dallas.  The community 
expressed a clear lack of support for the policy idea as presented, and 
while several other ideas were discussed, there was no clear consensus 
on a path forward for this policy proposal.  The AC would encourage the 
originator and any interested members of the community to continue 
discussions on the issue, and would welcome a future policy proposal on 
the topic if any areas of consensus can be found.  Due to the 
difficulties of gaining consensus on a policy that is so broad, the AC 
recommends that future work in this area should be narrowed to solve a 
specific problem."

The AC abandoned ARIN-prop-182. Anyone dissatisfied with this decision 
may initiate a petition. The petition to advance a proposal would be the 
"Discussion Petition." The deadline to begin a petition will be five 
business days after the AC's draft meeting minutes are published. For 
more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP 
Petitions at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html

Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:05:57 -0400
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2012-5: Removal of Renumbering
        Requirement for Small Multihomers - Last Call
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 26 October 2012 and decided to
send the following draft policy to last call:

   Draft Policy ARIN-2012-5: Removal of Renumbering Requirement for 
Small Multihomers

Feedback is encouraged during the last call period. All comments should
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. Last call for 2012-5 will
expire on 14 November 2012. After last call the AC will conduct their 
last call review.

The draft policy text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/

The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


Draft Policy ARIN-2012-5
Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers

Date: 25 July 2012

Policy statement:

Remove the entire subsection 4.3.6.2 "Additional Assignments for Small 
Multihomers".

Rationale:

The policy has had the unintended effect of freezing small multi homed 
end users from being able to return to ARIN for additional assignments. 
The requirement to renumber out of space is unique and is applying an 
undue burden of renumbering what would be an organization's core 
infrastructure.

Timetable for implementation: immediate






------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 14:06:11 -0400
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Draft Policy ARIN-2012-7: Reassignments for Third
        Party Internet Access (TPIA) over Cable - Last Call
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 26 October 2012 and decided to
send the following draft policy to last call:

   Draft Policy ARIN-2012-7: Reassignments for Third Party Internet 
Access (TPIA) over Cable

Feedback is encouraged during the last call period. All comments should
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. Last call for 2012-7 will
expire on 14 November 2012. After last call the AC will conduct their 
last call review.

The draft policy text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/

The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


Draft Policy ARIN-2012-7
Reassignments for Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) over Cable

Date: 12 October 2012

Policy statement:

Insert new section to NRPM to read as follows:

4.2.3.8 IP addresses reassigned by an ISP to an incumbent cable operator 
for use with Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) will be counted as fully 
used once they are assigned to equipment by the underlying cable carrier 
provided they meet the following requirements:

* initial assignments to each piece of hardware represent the smallest 
subnet reasonably required to deploy service to the customer base served 
by the hardware

* additional assignments to each piece of hardware are made only when 
all previous assignments to that specific piece of hardware are at least 
80% used and represent a three month supply

* IP allocations issued through 4.2.3.8 are non-transferable via section 
8.3 and section 8.4 for a period of 36 months. In the case of a section 
8.2 transfer the IP assignment must be utilized for the same purpose or 
needs based justification at a rate consistent with intended use.

Rationale:
A unique situation exists particularly, and perhaps only, in the 
Canadian region that is preventing legitimate ISPs from obtaining 
subsequent allocations of IPv4 addresses for use with the Third Party 
Internet Access
(TPIA) framework that has been mandated by the CRTC (Canada's version of 
the FCC). Adding this section to the NRPM will allow ISPs that intend to 
make use of this CRTC mandated framework to obtain the number resources 
that they require but are currently unable to obtain.

Timetable for implementation: immediate






------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:03:14 -0400
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - October
        2012
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

We've corrected a typo in the message below. Prop-180 was abandoned by 
the AC. This action may be petitioned.

In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process the ARIN Advisory
Council (AC) held a meeting on 26 October 2012 and made decisions about
several draft policies and proposals.

The AC moved the following draft policies to last call (they will be
posted separately to last call):

   ARIN-2012-5: Removal of Renumbering Requirement for Small Multihomers
   ARIN-2012-7: Reassignments for Third Party Internet Access (TPIA) 
over Cable

The following remains on the AC's docket:

   ARIN-2012-2: IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement
   ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
   ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

The following proposal was added to the AC's docket for development
and evaluation:

   ARIN-prop-182 Update Residential Customer Definition to not exclude 
wireless as Residential Service

The AC abandoned the following:

   ARIN-prop-180 ISP Private Reassignment

The AC provided the following statement: "The ARIN Advisory Council 
decided to abandon ARIN-prop-180 based on feedback from the community on 
PPML and at the Public Policy Meeting in Dallas.  The community 
expressed a clear lack of support for the policy idea as presented, and 
while several other ideas were discussed, there was no clear consensus 
on a path forward for this policy proposal.  The AC would encourage the 
originator and any interested members of the community to continue 
discussions on the issue, and would welcome a future policy proposal on 
the topic if any areas of consensus can be found.  Due to the 
difficulties of gaining consensus on a policy that is so broad, the AC 
recommends that future work in this area should be narrowed to solve a 
specific problem."

The AC abandoned ARIN-prop-180. Anyone dissatisfied with this decision 
may initiate a petition. The petition to advance a proposal would be the 
"Discussion Petition." The deadline to begin a petition will be five 
business days after the AC's draft meeting minutes are published. For 
more information on starting and participating in petitions, see PDP 
Petitions at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp_petitions.html

Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)






------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2012 09:53:54 -0500
From: David Farmer <[email protected]>
To: Martin Hannigan <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer
        enhancement
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

On 10/30/12 15:32 , Martin Hannigan wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 4:11 PM, David Farmer <[email protected]> wrote:
...
>> Section 8.4 is fairly specific that there needs to be a reciprocal policy at
>> the other RIR, if you remember I argued against that, but that is ARIN's
>> policy.
>
> +1
>
>> I'm willing to accept this on to the docket in order to not create a
>> catch-22, and make it clear ARIN is willing to consider this of other RIRs
>> are too.  However, I'm not sure significant effort should be put into it
>> until at least ASN transfers have been proposed at another RIR.
>
> Why bother working on policy if you aren't going to take it seriously?
> That also implies that we don't take registry accuracy seriously FWIW.

I do take this policy seriously and even support it.  But without 
reciprocal policy at another RIR this is actually an irrelevant piece of 
policy.  So unless there is some sign of another RIR taking up the 
issue, I believe the ARIN community has more important and timely issues 
to work on.

As a sign of good faith to the other RIRs I'd be willing to take this on 
the docket, I don't want to send the message we're not interested, like 
I said I support this.   However, without some sign of another RIR 
taking up the issue, I couldn't in good faith prioritizes this over 
other policy issues.  I'm not saying it can't or won't get worked on, 
but that just about everything else should probably take priority over 
it, unless there is activity on the issue in another RIR.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 89, Issue 1
****************************************

Reply via email to