Send ARIN-PPML mailing list submissions to
        [email protected]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [email protected]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [email protected]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of ARIN-PPML digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Advisory Council Meeting Results - December 2012 (ARIN)
   2. LAST CALL - Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4
      C/I Reserved Pool Size (ARIN)
   3. LAST CALL - Draft Policy ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3
      Transfer Policy (ARIN)
   4. Weekly posting summary for [email protected] (Thomas Narten)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:16:08 -0500
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Advisory Council Meeting Results - December 2012
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

In accordance with the ARIN Policy Development Process, the ARIN 
Advisory Council (AC) held a meeting on 20 December 2012 and made 
decisions about draft policies and proposals.

The AC moved the following draft policies to last call (they will be
posted separately to last call):

     ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
     ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

The AC is continuing to work on the following:

     ARIN-2012-2: IPv6 Subsequent Allocations Utilization Requirement
     ARIN-prop-182 Update Residential Customer Definition to not exclude 
wireless as Residential Service
     ARIN-prop-183 Section 8.4 Transfer enhancement

Draft Policy and Proposal texts are available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/index.html

The ARIN Policy Development Process can be found at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)



------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:18:01 -0500
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] LAST CALL - Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6: Revising
        Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 20 December 2012 and decided to
send the following draft policy to last call:

    Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6: Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size

The AC revised the text after the ARIN XXX Public Policy Meeting and 
asked for an updated staff assessment of the revised text. The 
assessment is available at: 
https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/2012_6_staff_assessment.html

Feedback is encouraged during the last call period. All comments should
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. Last call for 2012-6 will
expire on 15 January 2013. After last call the AC will conduct their
last call review.

The draft policy text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/

The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


Draft Policy ARIN-2012-6
Revising Section 4.4 C/I Reserved Pool Size

Date: 27 December 2012

Policy statement:

4.4. Micro-allocation ARIN will make IPv4 micro-allocations to critical 
infrastructure providers of the Internet, including public exchange 
points, core DNS service providers (e.g. ICANN-sanctioned root and ccTLD 
operators) as well as the RIRs and IANA. These allocations will be no 
smaller than a /24. Multiple allocations may be granted in certain 
situations.

Exchange point allocations MUST be allocated from specific blocks 
reserved only for this purpose. All other micro-allocations WILL be 
allocated out of other blocks reserved for micro-allocation purposes. 
ARIN will make a list of these blocks publicly available.

Exchange point operators must provide justification for the allocation, 
including: connection policy, location, other participants (minimum of 
two total), ASN, and contact information. ISPs and other organizations 
receiving these micro-allocations will be charged under the ISP fee 
schedule, while end-users will be charged under the fee schedule for 
end-users. This policy does not preclude exchange point operators from 
requesting address space under other policies.

ARIN will place an equivalent of a /16 of IPv4 address space in a 
reserve for Critical Infrastructure, as defined in section 4.4. If at 
the end of the policy term there is unused address space remaining in 
this pool, ARIN staff is authorized to utilize this space in a manner 
consistent with community expectations.

ICANN-sanctioned gTLD operators may justify up to the equivalent of an 
IPv4 /23 block for each authorized new gTLD, allocated from the free 
pool or received via transfer, but not from the above reservation. This 
limit of a /23 equivalent per gTLD does not apply to gTLD allocations 
made under previous policy.

Rationale:

Additional ICANN-sanctioned DNS infrastructure is being added to the 
Internet and in quantities greater than anticipated when the micro 
allocation proposal was written and adopted.

The original CI pool was created to serve new IXP and new CI 
requirements. The pending need is estimated to be over 1000 new gTLD 
range, which may exhaust the current /16 reservation before the ARIN 
free pool is exhausted. Once the current /16 reservation is exhausted, 
CI providers would no longer be eligible to receive address space, 
either via the general free pool or via transfer.

The original proposal dealt with this by expanding the reservation to a 
/15 and allowing CI to draw from the free pool instead of the 
reservation until it gets down to a /8. The consensus coming out of the 
Dallas meeting seems to be that this is an inadequate solution. As the 
new expanded gTLD demand will obliterate any reasonable reservation, 
leaving no resources for the other IXP and CI demands that the original 
reservation was intended to serve. It is therefore, not possible to 
services them both out of a common reservation.

In order to ensure continued access to IPv4 number resources by new IXP 
and DNS operators alike, the AC is modifying the proposal going into 
last call to allow gTLD operators to continue to qualify for micro 
allocations from the general free pool or via transfer only, and leaving 
one /16 reserved for IXP, root, and ccTLD DNS operators.

As a result of the close examination of the CI policy brought about by 
this proposal, the AC has identified a number of issues in the original 
policy text that should be addressed. However, the AC is intentionally 
minimizing the overall changes to this proposal as much as possible for 
last call in keeping with the spirit of the PDP. The AC intends to make 
future proposals to deal with these other concerns. The current proposal 
addresses issues of some urgency and we did not want to delay it to 
another policy cycle as a result.



------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 14:18:21 -0500
From: ARIN <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] LAST CALL - Draft Policy ARIN-2012-8: Aligning
        8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed

The ARIN Advisory Council (AC) met on 20 December 2012 and decided to
send the following draft policy to last call:

    Draft Policy ARIN-2012-8: Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

The AC revised the text after the ARIN XXX Public Policy Meeting and 
asked for an updated staff assessment of the revised text. The 
assessment is available at: 
https://www.arin.net/policy/archive/2012_8_staff_assessment.html

Feedback is encouraged during the last call period. All comments should
be provided to the Public Policy Mailing List. Last call for 2012-8 will
expire on 15 January 2013. After last call the AC will conduct their
last call review.

The draft policy text is below and available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/proposals/

The ARIN Policy Development Process is available at:
https://www.arin.net/policy/pdp.html

Regards,

Communications and Member Services
American Registry for Internet Numbers (ARIN)


## * ##


Draft Policy ARIN-2012-8
Aligning 8.2 and 8.3 Transfer Policy

Date: 27 December 2012

Policy statement:

Replace the first paragraph of section 8.2 with the following (second 
paragraph remains unchanged):

ARIN will consider requests for the transfer of number resources in the 
case of mergers and acquisitions under the following conditions:

  * The new entity must provide evidence that they have acquired assets
    that use the resources to be transferred from the current
    registrant. ARIN will maintain an up-to-date list of acceptable
    types of documentation.
  * The current registrant must not be involved in any dispute as to the
    status of the resources to be transferred.
  * The new entity must sign an RSA covering all resources to be
    transferred.
  * The resources to be transferred will be subject to ARIN policies.
  * The minimum transfer size is the smaller of the original allocation
    size or the applicable minimum allocation size in current policy.

Rationale:

The base intent here is to lower confusion, raise clarity, and level the 
bar between 8.2 and 8.3 transfers. M&A transfers are distinct from 
specified transfers and not all of the same rules can apply - but many 
can and should. Therefor this policy change explicitly adds requirements 
which do not exist in 8.2 policy text today: Source must be the 
undisputed current registered holder, recipient must sign an RSA (and is 
subject to policy), and /24 minimum for IPv4, /48 for IPv6.

Changes following discussion at the ARIN XXX public policy meeting: 1) 
Changed the first bullet. This was an area for objections because it did 
not allow chain of custody transfers, so now instead of saying that the 
purchased company must be the current registrant holder it simply says 
that there can not be any dispute as to who the registered holder is. 2) 
Removed the " such that their continued need is justified" text from the 
second bullet, this was another area of debate at the meeting and 
justification is already covered in paragraph 2 of 8.2 (which remains 
unchanged). 3) Swapped the first two bullets. 4) Added "covering all 
transferred resources" to the RSA bullet, for clarity. 5) Swapped the 
third and fourth bullets. 3) Altered the IPv4 minimum allocation to 
bring it in line with 4.10 resources and any future exceptions.

Changes following PPML discussion in November 2012: a) 'used' was 
changed back to 'use' in the first bullet to prevent a backdoor around 
specified transfers leveraging asset liquidation. b) The third bullet 
was shortened for clarity (removed the word 'current' before 'policy') 
c) The minimum transfer sizes are now pinned to policy rather than hard-set.

Timetable for implementation: immediate




------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 00:53:02 -0500
From: Thomas Narten <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: [arin-ppml] Weekly posting summary for [email protected]
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

Total of 5 messages in the last 7 days.
 
script run at: Fri Dec 28 00:53:02 EST 2012
 
    Messages   |      Bytes        | Who
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
 80.00% |    4 | 81.57% |    26952 | [email protected]
 20.00% |    1 | 18.43% |     6090 | [email protected]
--------+------+--------+----------+------------------------
100.00% |    5 |100.00% |    33042 | Total



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
ARIN-PPML mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml

End of ARIN-PPML Digest, Vol 90, Issue 10
*****************************************

Reply via email to