On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Scott Leibrand <scottleibr...@gmail.com> wrote: > For opponents of the current 2013-4 text, I would love to hear whether there > are any elements of 2013-4 (or the original RFC 2050) that are missing from > rfc2050bis and would be good to document.
Hi Scott, I wouldn't add a thing. 2050 bis stops at a far more appropriate level of abstraction for a statement of principles than 2013-4 does. Caveat that I think 2050 bis fouls up goal #2. But I'm quite satisfied with goals 1 and 3. -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 _______________________________________________ PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: http://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
